Do you know someone who would appreciate a present that will help protect the future of accessible green spaces for all?
We are dismayed that the Lake District National Park Authority’s Development Control Committee has approved the Honister zip-wire. The application was made by the Honister Slate Mine for an aerial zip-wire and other structures over the Honister Pass in the Lake District National Park
The committee overturned the recommendation for refusal from national park planning officer Kevin Richards. The application was also opposed by the government adviser, Natural England, the Friends of the Lake District, Cumbria Wildlife Trust, Wainwright Society, Buttermere Parish Council and 124 other objectors.
The national park authority rejected a similar application in 2012. The objectors point out that since then the Lake District has been designated a World Heritage Site so the case against the development is even stronger.
Kevin Richards, in a well-argued report, concluded that any benefits of the scheme did not ‘outweigh the adverse landscape and visual effects identified and the harm to the special qualities and Outstanding Universal Value of the Lake District’. Outstanding Universal Value is an essential quality of a World Heritage Site.
Says our general secretary, Kate Ashbrook: ‘The zip-wire would be an unacceptable intrusion in this wild area; it would be highly visible from the adjoining fells and would create an irreconcilable conflict with the protection of the natural beauty of the park. We consider it to be contrary to the purposes of the national park, and to breach the Sandford Principle which requires that, where conservation and recreation are in conflict, the park authority must give priority to conservation.
‘Now that the Lake District is a World Heritage Site it deserves even greater protection. We believe that the park authority members have demonstrated a lamentable lack of care for this splendid and unique area.
‘The committee members have overruled the expert advice of their officer, and we fear that this will set a precedent for allowing inappropriate development in national parks.
‘While we are not against zip-wires or adventurous recreation, we consider that this one is most definitely in the wrong place.
‘We shall talk to the other objectors about what action we might take. We do not consider this battle yet to be over,’ Kate concludes.